in070660


May 31, 2007


Subject:  Benjamen Meyer Contribution - Contributions from a US Citizen regarding INCITS/V1 for Consideration During Development of Proposed US Vote on ISO/IEC DIS 29500 Office Open XML File Formats



From:
Lisa Rajchel [lrajchel@ansi.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 1:18 PM
To: Garner, Jennifer
Subject: FW: Contributions from a US Citizen regarding INCITS/V1 for Consideration During Development of Proposed US Vote on ISO/IEC DIS 29500 Office Open XML File Formats


-----Original Message-----
From: BRM [mailto:bm_witness@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 1:05 PM
To: lrajchel@ansi.org
Subject: Contributions from a US Citizen regarding INCITS/V1 for Consideration During Development of Proposed US Vote on ISO/IEC DIS 29500 Office Open XML File Formats

Dear Lisa Rajchel,

I am writing this to you, a member of the ISO JTC1 committee, as a U.S.
Citizen in concern for the US Vote towards the recommendation of
Microsoft's OOXML Format.

Please vote AGAINST this measure. OOXML should NOT be fast tracked to
an ISO standard. This will only cause confusion as there is already an
ISO standard for what OOXML cover, and will only make it harder to
guarantee that documents that are required to be open for the public
are truly open for the public, and will remain open to the public for
years to come.

Additionally, there have been numerous issues with OOXML brought forth,
including double standards within it (e.g. dates), its length (6000+
pages), and its lock-in to Microsoft Word's implementations (e.g.
spacing as done by Word 95, etc.

Furthermore, the OOXML is burdened by patents that Microsoft holds -
which Microsoft admits. Therefore only parties that Microsoft approves
will be able to implement the standard without infringing their
patents. This prevents groups such as those behind KOffice, OpenOffice,
AbiWord, and others from implementing the OOXML standard - groups which
do implement the existing ISO standard.

Please help our government and economy by moving us away from
dependence on a single vendor - Microsoft, and move us towards an open
standards society where vendor specific software is not required.

Microsoft is more than welcome to make contributions to the current ISO
standard and help it become better and do more things. But please let
there be one standard, and please do not let a vendor - any vendor -
control it.

Finally, please check out the following website where there is a good
deal of description and discussion of the problems regarding OOXML:
http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections.

Thank you for you time and have a good day.

Sincerely,

Benjamen R. Meyer
U.S. Citizen & IEEE Member
Johnstown, PA 15905
bm_witness@yahoo.com