in030384

InterNational Committee for Information Technology Standards
INCITS Secretariat, Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)
1250 Eye St. NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20005
Telephone 202-737-8888; Fax 202-638-4922; Email: incits@itic.org
Date: January 27, 2003
Project: 1571-DT
Ref. Doc:  None
Reply to:  Deborah J. Spittle, INCITS Secretariat
Phone: 202/626-5746
Email: dspittle@itic.org

To: INCITS Community & INCITS EB Members - For Information
From: Deborah J. Spittle, Associate Manager, INCITS
Subject: T11's Response to negatives votes and comments received for T11 Letter Ballot (T11/02-748v0) INCITS/TR-33, Draft technical report for: Information technology - Fibre Channel - Signal Modeling (FCSM)



From:  Snively, Robert
Sent:  Thursday, March 20, 2003 4:17 PM
To:  'neil_edmunds@uk.xyratex.com'
Cc:  Spittle, Deborah; 'schelto.vandoorn@intel.com'; 'cjanz@akara.com'; Snively, Robert; Steve Wilson; Kumar Malavalli; 'rmartin@brocade.com'; Jim Kleinsteiber; 'bill_ham@ix.netcom.com'; 'Mark.w.hamel@hp.com'; 'harry.paul@inrange.com'; 'Brad.Solomon@inrange.com'; 'gregory.koellner@inrange.com'; 'levinpa@earthlink.net'
Subject:  Review response to letter ballot comments on forwarding motion for INCITS project 1507-DT, FCSM.

<File: FCSM - cmnt resolution - t11-02-748v0.pdf>

T11/03-128v1

  _____

Accredited Standards Committee, INCITS, Information Technology
INCITS Secretariat, Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)
1250 Eye St. NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20005
Telephone 202-737-8888; Fax 202-638-4922; Email: incits@itic.org

Date:

March 20, 2003

Project:

1507-DT

Ref. Docs:

T11/02-748v0 (Comment Resolution)

T11/03-004v0 (FCSM, rev 6)

Reply to:

Robert Snively, TC T11 Chair

Phone:

408-487-8135

Email:

rsnively@brocade.com
  _____

To:

Neil Edmunds (neil_edmunds@uk.xyratex.com)
        REPLY REQUESTED

cc:

Deborah Spittle, INCITS (dspittle@itic.org)
 

        FOR INFORMATION ONLY
 

Schelto van Doorn, Chair TG T11.2 (schelto.vandoorn@intel.com)

Chris Janz (cjanz@akara.com)

Robert Snively (rsnively@brocade.com)
Steven L. Wilson (swilson@brocade.com)
Kumar Malavalli (kumar@brocade.com)
William R. Martin (rmartin@brocade.com)
Jim Kleinsteiber (jkleinst@brocade.com)

Bill Ham (bill_ham@ix.netcom.com)
Mark Hamel (Mark.w.hamel@hp.com)

Harry V. Paul (harry.paul@inrange.com)
Brad Solomon (Brad.Solomon@inrange.com)
Gregory Koellner (gregory.koellner@inrange.com)

Paul Levin (levinpa@earthlink.net)
 
 

From:

Robert Snively, T11 Chairman

1745 Technology Drive

San Jose, CA 95110

Subject:

Review response to letter ballot comments on forwarding motion for INCITS project 1507-DT, FCSM.

_____

Dear Mr. Edmunds:

Thank you for your letter ballot comment on Project 1507-DT (FCSM).  INCITS T11 has carefully reviewed the comments.  The resolution of the letter ballot comments is described in document T11/02-748v0, which is enclosed for reference.  The resulting revision of FCSM is revision 6, documented as T11/03-004v0 on the web-site http://www.t11.org/.

Please notify us whether or not the response by the TC resolves the comment(s) by your member organization to your satisfaction, allowing you to withdraw the comment(s).  Please reply to: rsnively@brocade.com and ddonovan@itic.org

In accordance with ANSI requirements, we are advising you in this letter of the Appeals Processes.  The appeals process is stated below.

  _____

Appeals Processes

You may appeal an action of INCITS, its subgroups, or its Secretariat.  The INCITS Appeals Procedures are in Section 5.9 of the INCITS Standing Document SD-2.

As indicated in INCITS SD-2, you may further appeal to the ANSI Board of Standards Review according to the process described at:  http://public.ansi.org/ansionline/Documents/Standards%20Activities/American%20National%20Standards/Procedures,%20Guides,%20and%20Forms/ER2003.doc

Please note, in accordance with BSR Procedures, those objecting to the approvals or withdrawals are hereby notified of their right of appeal. The appeal must be based on due process or lack of consensus and include a statement as to why the BSR action should be modified.  The BSR will not render decisions on the relative merits of technical matters, but it shall consider whether due process was afforded technical concerns.

If you have not completed the appeals process at the standards developer, you are normally not eligible to appeal to the BSR.
 

  _____

Once again, thank you for your interest in the FCSM draft technical report.

Sincerely,

Robert Snively, Chair INCITS TC T11

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.

1745 Technology Drive

San Jose, CA  95110

E-Mail:              rsnively@brocade.com

Phone:              (408) 487-8135

Fax:                  (408) 392-6655

cc:  Deborah Spittle, INCITS Secretariat
       Schelto van Doorn, Chair TG T11.2