Covering the Period from April 2004 to May 2005
Title of INCITS Subgroup: Programming Language C
Links:
All work has occurred on schedule with a minimum of controversy.
Type 2 Technical Report on C Extensions to Support Embedded Processors has been approved.
Type 2 Technical Report on Additional Character Data Types to the Programming Language C has been approved.
Technical Corrigendum 2 for ISO/IEC 9899: 1999, Programming Language - C has been approved.
In general, the committee is expected to continue work on the TRs described above.
| Date | Location |
| October 25-29, 2004 | Redmond, WA |
| April 4-8, 2005 | Lillehammer, Norway |
| Date | Location |
| September 25-28, 2005 | Mont Trembant, Quebec, Canada |
| Late March/Early April, 2006 | Berlin Germany |
The SC22/WG14 website contains more detailed information about meetings. Sometimes meeting announcements first appear in committee mailings before the meeting web page is updated.
To best utilize the considerable technical expertise available in J11, J11 and SC22/WG14 will continue to hold co-located meetings. Every other meeting will be located in either North America or the United States.
SC22/WG14 (ISO C): assist with revision of C standard.
J16: coordinate issues common to C/C++. A number of organizations have joint membership in J11 and J16. When the organization is willing, J11 appoints each representative of such organizations as a liaisons to J16 to insure close communication.
Chair
Randy Meyers
rmeyers@ix.netcom.com
Silverhill Systems Inc.
4025 Gumwood LN
Knoxville, TN 37921-1364
Last trained: August 6, 2002.
Vice-Chair
Fred Tydeman
tydeman@tybor.com
Tydeman Consulting
1137 Harbour Cove Court
Sparks, NV 89434
Last trained: --
International Representative
Douglas Walls
douglas.walls@sun.com
Sun Microsystems
M/S UMPK16-303
901 San Antonio Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Last trained: May 16, 2002
Vocabulary Representative
Open.
The membership list is available.
C++ and Java have reduced the pressure for new features in C, and increased the desire for C to remain stable with few disruptions that could affect its very large code base.
To that end, the committee thinks that the 1999 Standard should be reaffirmed, and that at this time, further evolution of the language should be through type 2 technical reports that target specific concerns of the marketplace.