LX/04-0020


in040497


April 13, 2004



LINUX STUDY GROUP REPORT TO THE INCITS EB - APRIL 2004

Dave Thewlis, Chairman, INCITS Linux Study Group




1.    Linux Rapporteur Group Meeting

The meeting of the Linux Rapporteur Group was held in Tokyo, Japan on 3-5 February 2004.  My Head of Delegation Report for this meeting is IN/04-0316.

As may be seen from that report, the recommendations produced by the LRG at the meeting were very satisfactory to U.S. positions.  The LRG decided that the FSG was doing fine with Linux Standardization and didn't see any reason for SC 22 to get involved.  It saw no reason for a new working group or other entity in SC 22 to deal with the NWI on Posix/Linux differences and recommended that the NWI be dealt with by SC 22 itself given that it is nearly complete.  And it saw no reason for any new working group in SC 22 to deal with Linux issues, feeling that regular liaison relationships with the FSG would be fine for the submission of requirements, etc.  It did recommend that FSG establish liaisons with SC 22 and SC 35, and considered (but did not recommend) a liaison with SC 27. The LRG also noted that it had completed all of its tasks and saw no reason for any subsequent meeting of the LRG prior to reporting to SC 22.

The only strong support for a more active role in Linux for SC 22 came from Keld Simonsen, representing the DKUUG (Danish Unix User's Group) and to some degree from Canada.  This may be because there was essentially no European representation at the meeting.  Keld was representing DKUUG and not Norway; the U.K. representative was Nick Stoughton, who was there primarily on behalf of FSG and Usenix (and who is based in Oakland, California).  ECMA was
represented by Ted Smith, whom I had never met, and said he was there as an observer.

It is still possible that some NB or SC 22 entity may propose a subsequent NWI related to the Posix/Linux differences, or to do something else, but no suggestion was made from the LRG meeting.

2.  Future of INCITS Study Group on Linux

As far as I know, the intent in INCITS has been that, if/when a new Working Group on Linux was created in SC 22, the U.S. would morph or fold this Study Group into a new U.S. TC which would be our TAG to the new WG.  At the LRG meeting, John Hill, the SC 22 Chairman, was very clear that he wanted a recommendation to create a new WG or perhaps a way to re-instantiate WG 15 with an expanded charter, to give SC 22 a new and interesting technology.  He didn't get it from the LRG meeting but that doesn't mean something may not emerge elsewhere.  In any case, whether it has another meeting or does anything else, the Linux Rapporteur Group will exist until the next SC 22 Plenary meeting in September.

Under the circumstances, I recommend to the INCITS Execytuve Board that the Linux Study Group be maintained as the TAG to the LRG and a P member of CT 22, which will help us maintain awareness of what may be going on elsewhere in SC 22 with respect to Linux.