LX/05-0016

Draft Minutes

INCITS Study Group on Linux
Meeting Number 7
Development of the US Position and Comments on the Linux Standard Base PAS Submission (DIS 23360)

February 24-25, 2005

Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)
1250 Eye Street, NW
Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone:    (202) 737-8888
Fax:              (202) 638-4922

  Thursday  
  February 24, 2005     10:00 AM - 5:00 PM 
  Friday   February 25, 2005     9:00 AM - 3:00 PM



1. Administrative
1.1 Call to Order (D. Thewlis)
Mr. Thewlis called the meeting to order at 10:00 Eastern Standard Time on 24 February 2005.

1.2 Introduction of New Members and Attendees (D. Thewlis)
Members in Attendance: 

Karen Higginbottom  (Hewlett Packard)
Theodore Ts'o (IBM)
David Thewlis (Intel)
Don Cragun (Sun)
Nick Stoughton (USENIX)

Members Absent (Oracle)

1.3 Changes in Membership (D. Thewlis)
Reference: LX/05-0012 (Termination of Sony Electronics Membership), LX/05-0013 (Termination of Department of Defense Membership),
                    LX/05-0014 (IBM in jeopardy due to missing two consecutive meetings)

The memberships of Sony Electronics and the Department of Defense in the INCITS Study Group on Linux were terminated after the February 7, 2005 meeting due to failure to participate.  IBM was notified that its membership was in jeopardy due to a failure to attend two consecutive meetings.  IBM was present at this meeting so the jeopardy notice is no longer relevant.
The membership of the INCITS Study Group on Linux now stands at six:  HP, IBM, Intel, Oracle, Sun, USENIX.

1.4 Approval of Minutes from the Sixth Meeting of the INCITS Study Group on Linux - February 7, 2005 (D. Thewlis)
          Reference:  LX05-0011

           The minutes of the Sixth Meeting of the INCITS Study Group on Linux were approved unanimously.

            M/Thewlis, S/Higginbottom.

1.5 Approval of the Final Agenda for the February 24-25 Meeting (D. Thewlis)

Reference:  LX/05-0015

The Agenda for the Seventh Meeting of the INCITS Study Group on Linux was adopted unanimously without change.

M/Stoughton, S/Cragun.



2. Convener's Remarks
(D. Thewlis)



3.  Establishment of Recommended U.S. Positions and Comments

3.1 Review of Member Comments and Organizational Positions (D. Thewlis)
           Reference:   "Consolidated Comments on DIS 22360", "Sun LSB Comments.pdf", "USENIX LSB_ISO_Comments.doc"
     
For members' convenience, "Consolidated Comments on DIS 22360" contains the text of all comments posted to the INCITS SGL Reflector as e-mail text. "Sun LSB COmments.pdf" and "USENIX LSB_ISO_Comments.doc" were circulated to the Reflector as attachments to e-mails.  These three documents were recirculated to the mailing list via a single e-mail on 16 February 2005 by Mr. Thewlis, the Convenor.  As these are draft positions and comments, it was not deemed appropriate to post them to the INCITS SGL Document Register as open documents.

Reviewed Sun comments.  Sun still opposes.  Usenix and IBM support, so does HP and Intel. 

Should be a definite entry in US comments to document how to support multiple versions/releases (betterdescribed).  Bring out more in formal description that it is possible, and have less formal How To document on website.  Non-normative appendix.  Need detailed plan for addressing differences between Posix and Linux (as defined in Andrew's differences document).

Reviewed and modified Usenix comments.

3.2 Action:  Establishment of Recommended U.S. Position and Comments on LSB PAS
(D. Thewlis)
          As noted in LX/04-0024 (IN/04-1417):

The committee is to coordinate and develop the U.S. recommended position to INCITS EB for approval for submission to ISO/IEC JTC 1. The position must be submitted in a format consistent with the guidelines specified by the JTC 1 Secretariat in JTC 1 N 5348.

The position options are: approve; approve with general, technical and/or editorial comments; disapprove for reasons which are to be explained in an attached paper with recommended wording which, if accepted, would change the U.S. vote to one of approval, or abstain.

Any comments developed in support of the U.S. position should be presented in the enclosed ISO Comments Template document.

IMPORTANT

The committee should return the U.S. recommendation to the INCITS Secretariat for approval by a 30-day letter ballot no later than March 15, 2005 so that, if necessary, a 10-day reconsideration ballot may be conducted and the U.S. vote forwarded to ANSI by to the JTC 1 closing date of May 10, 2005.

          3.2.1   Development of recommended comments for U.S. Position

                     The final set of recommended comments to accompany the recommendation to the INCITS Executive Board were developed.


          3.2.2   Establishment of Recommended U.S. Position and Comments.

The INCITS Study Group on Linux recommends to the INCITS Executive Board that the United States vote to approve the PAS Submission on DIS 23360 with comments as developed by the INCITS SGL and submitted with this recommendation.

M/Stoughton, S/Cragun.

Role call vote, all members present voted YES.  Final tally:  5,0,0,1 (Oracle was not present)

Motion carried unanimously and satisfies the requirements for a 2/3 vote.


          3.3 Action:  Establishment of Recommendation on Adoption of DIS 22360 as U.S. National Standard

                     As noted in LX/04-0024 (IN/04-1417).

The study group should notify the INCITS Secretariat if this standard is unsuitable for adoption as an American National Standard. A vote of majority approval accompanied by comments specifying the reasons for non-adoption is required. The recommendation for non-adoption should be sent simultaneously with the recommendation to INCITS EB. The INCITS Secretariat will adopt the ISO/IEC Standard unless notified, see INCITS Adoption Policy. The initiation for adoption will begin upon publication of the resulting standard.


       
3.3.1   Establishment of Recommendation on Adoption of DIS 22360 as a U.S. National Standard

Mr. Thewlis noted that the specific requirement was that the Study Group should notify the INCITS Secretariat if the standard was unsuitable for adoption as an American National Standard.  Discussion in the study group determined that the standard was suitable. Therefore the Chair ruled that no recommendation on this issue need be made to the INCITS Secretariat.



4. Next Meetings (D. Thewlis)

4.1     Eighth Meeting of the INCITS Study Group on Linux

4.1.1   As there is no requirement for another in-person meeting of the INCITS Study Group on Linux at this time, the tentative 10-11 March Meeting
            at ITI has been canceled.

4.1.2  The eighth meeting of the INCITS Study Group on Linux will be held by teleconference on 23 May 2005 at 1300 Eastern Time.

This meeting will conduct an initial review of  ballot responses and comments on the PAS Ballot on DIS 23360, and determine how the INCITS SGL will examine these materials and develop US positions on them.  The meeting will also establish the U.S. Delegation to the Ballot Resolution Meeting if possible.

If the ballot responses and comments have not been distributed prior to 23 May, the Convenor is directed to postpone this meeting until they have been made available by the SC 22 Secretariat.


4.2   Consideration of potential delegation to a Ballot Resolution Meeting on the LSG PAS

HP, IBM, Intel and possibly USENIX expect to participate in the US Delegation at this time.  Mr. Thewlis expects to be Head of Delegation.  Mr. Stoughton noted that he would be at the meeting in the capacity of  Project Editor and would not be part of the U.S. Delegation.





5. Review of Action Items (D. Thewlis)

5.1   Mr.Thewlis will submit the final recommended U.S. position and comments to the INCITS Executive Board.

5.2   Mr. Thewlis will submit his report to the April INCITS Executive Board meeting.

5.2   Mr. Thewlis will reschedule the 23 May conference call if the SC22 Secretariat has not distributed the final results of the PAS Ballot on DIS 23360
        before 20 May.




6. Adjournment                                           
(D. Thewlis)

    The meeting was adjourned at 17:30 Eastern Time on 24 February 2005 (M/Stoughton).