LX/06-0003
ANNUAL REPORT
FOR INCITS STUDY GROUP ON LINUX
PERIOD: June 2005 through May 2006
Title of Group: INCITS STUDY GROUP ON LINUX
Document Register: INCITS
SGL Document Register
Submitted by Dave Thewlis,
Convenor, INCITS Study Group on Linux
Description: The INCITS
Study Group on Linux was created by the INCITS Executive Board in
September, 2004 to provide an INCITS Technical Advisory Group
(TAG) to develop U.S. positions and represent the United States to
Linux-related activities within JTC 1 and SC 22 in the absence of a
formal Technical Committee, which would only be formed upon the
creation of an international Linux Subcommittee or Working Group.
The INCITS SGL is therefore both an administrative and technical group,
although it is not charged with doing any actual technical work other
than reviewing proposals, activities and comments and developing and
furthering U.S. positions. At the time of creation, it was the
intent of the INCITS Executive Board that the INCITS SGL would be
replaced by or evolve into an INCITS Technical Committee should an
international Linux Subcommittee or Working Group be established within
JTC 1. As of May 2006 INCITS has not seen a need for such a TC,
and the TAG responsibilities for this area remain with the INCITS Study
Group on Linux. The INCITS Study Group on Linux participates in
CT 22 and is requested by CT 22 to make recommendations on any
POSIX-related standards.
1. Executive Summary
Background: JTC 1/SC 22 was authorized by the
October, 2002 JTC 1 Plenary to investigate the field of Linux
standardization and determine what if any role JTC 1 should seek in
this area. SC 22 held a Linux Study Group meeting in late May in
London, England, to which INCITS sent a delegation of four
people. Among the recommendations of that Study Group were that
the Free Standards Group, the primary driver of Linux standardization,
should seek PAS Submitter status with JTC 1 and should submit the Linux
Standard Base and relevant extensions such as hardware specific
extensions as PAS's; that FSG should seek Category A Liaison status
with SC 22; and that a study of the differences between Linux and POSIX
should be undertaken. In September, the JTC 1/SC 22 Plenary
accepted the recommendations of the Linux Study Group, established an
SC 22 Linux Rapporteur Group and began investigating possible roles for
SC 22 WGs in the Linux Field.
With the establishment of the SC 22 Linux Rapporteur Group and the
application of the Free Standards Group to become a PAS Submitter, the
INCITS Executive Board established the INCITS Study Group on Linux to
provide a U.S. TAG to the SC 22 Linux Rapporteur Group or other
Linux-related activities within SC 22 or JTC 1. At that time it
was unclear whether JTC 1's involvement with Linux would ultimately
result in a Linux Working Group in SC 22 (or elsewhere) or not.
The intent of the INCITS Executive Board was that the INCITS SGL would
be replaced by or evolve into an INCITS Technical Committee if an
international working activity began within JTC 1 in the area of
Linux. No need for this TC has appeared so far and the INCITS
Study Group on Linux retains the TAG responsibility for this area.
Membership Status: Participation
in the INCITS SGL is currently at six members, five P members and an
Advisory member. Membership has remained constant for this
reporting period.
Unusual Attributes: As
the INCITS Study Group on Linux was created by the INCITS Executive
Board as a sort of "placeholder" to support U.S. interests until and
unless a Technical Committee were to be formed, it has some slightly
different characteristics than a Technical Committee. One is that
the Convenor of the INCITS SGL is required to submit a written report
to the INCITS Executive Board quarterly; that is, for each meeting of
the EB. Another is that it is charged with more of an
administrative and coordination role than a purely technical role, and
is not intended to do any standards development activities under its
auspices, nor participate in any such activities in its role as TAG to
Linux-related international activities of any sort within JTC 1.
2. Significant Accomplishments
The INCITS Study Group on Linux successfully promoted U.S. positions
and interests in the February, 2004 meeting of the JTC 1/SC 22 Linux
Rapporteur Group, specifically in helping to ensure that actual Linux
standards development activities remain coordinated within the Free
Standards Group, rather than become disbursed between FSG and its
related activities, and one or more working groups or other activities
within JTC 1/SC 22. The U.S. position was first, that that the
role of JTC 1 and SC 22 in Linux standardization should be as a
facilitator in helping Linux specifications progress into International
Standards via the PAS process, and that SC 22 Working Groups should
provide information and requirements as necessary into FSG activities
rather than attempt to fork the Linux standardization track with the
potential for duplicative and redundant efforts. A second major
element of the U.S. position was that while convergence of Linux and
POSIX was ultimately attractive, it should not be allowed to impede or
disrupt the progression of Linux standardization or the adoption of
Linux itself. The third major element of the U.S. strategy
was to avoid any potential for disruption of the emerging relationship
between JTC 1 and the open source community.
In the period covered by this report, two significant items have
happened, although not particularly the accomplishment of the Study
Group on Linux.
- The INCITS Study Group on Linux sent a delegation of
three people to the Ballot Resolution Meeting for DIS 23360 in
Singapore in September of 2005. The Ballot Resolution Meeting was
extremely successful, and the three
outstanding "no" votes from the Letter Ballot were converted to "yes"
votes. The Head of Delegation Report for this meeting is document
IN/05-0753.
- The Study Group on Linux prepared a
recommendation to the INCITS Executive Board on JTC 1 N 8017, Technical
Report on Conflicts between ISO/IEC 9945 (POSIX) and ISO/IEC 23360
(Linux Standard Base) for the subsequent EB ballot. The
recommendation, transmitted to the INCITS Secretariat on 25 January
2006, was a unanimous vote to approve without comments. The
United States subsequently voted to approve JTC 1 N 8017, and it
was ultimately approved via JTC 1 N 8106.
3. Significant Challenges
None.
4. Expected Challenges
None.
5. Committee Activities:
a. Previous Meetings:
|
Meeting #
|
Date
|
Location
|
|
1
|
December 2, 2003
|
ITI, Washington, D.C.
|
|
2
|
January 16, 2004
|
Teleconference
|
|
3
|
December 3, 2004
|
Teleconference
|
|
4
|
January 17, 2005
|
Teleconference
|
|
5
|
January 28, 2005
|
Teleconference
|
|
6
|
February 7, 2005
|
Teleconference
|
|
7
|
February 24, 2005
|
ITI, Washington, D.C.
|
8
|
June 7, 2005
|
Teleconference
|
9
|
June 24, 2005
|
Teleconference
|
b. Planned Meetings:
None at this time..
6. Liaison Activities
None.
7. Membership and Officers:
a Officers
The INCITS Study Group on Linux has
only one officer, its Convenor (Chair).
Convenor (Chair) Dave
Thewlis, Intel Corporation (Trained October
13, 2003)
b. Membership
Membership in the INCITS Study Group on Linux stands
at six:
- Hewlett Packard
- IBM
- Intel
- Oracle (Advisory)
- Sun Microsystems
- USENIX
8. Future Trends and
Related Technical Activities
The significant issue for JTC 1 and INCITS has to do with what
if any Linux-related standardization activities happen within JTC
1.
At this time, the existing model is that Linux standardization should
continue to be centered in the FSG, with JTC 1 entities providing
input, requirements, and suggestions via liaison with FSG or other
mechanisms, but not embarking on actual development of Linux standards
within JTC 1. At the same time, JTC 1 clearly has an ongoing
responsibility for POSIX standardization, and there is an expressed
view towards the ultimate convergence of the Linux and POSIX
standards. (The precise definition of "convergence" may be
debated.)
At this time it appears that these areas can be progressed
satisfactorily by a combination of FSG participation via the PAS
process and liaison activities, and the participation of FSG and USENIX
in SC 22 activities directly where appropriate. However, if at a
future point SC 22 or another JTC 1 entity decided that it wanted to
aggressively pursue actual Linux standardization activities, the models
would change and it isn't clear what would happen. In a broader
sense, the Linux-related process that has happened within JTC 1 can
provide a useful model for future activities involving other parts of
the open source community, in addition to helping to encourage
standardization within that community and by progressing its
specifications to become full International Standards.
9. Other Administrative
Information
The INCITS Study Group on Linux collects no fees and has no
assets.
With respect to the future of the INCITS Study Group on Linux, after
the successful adoption of IS 23360, the INCITS Executive Board
determined that it wanted to keep the INCITS Study Group on Linux
intact to deal with possible future Linux-related issues, in particular
yearly
corrigenda, plus the prospect in the future of other
Linux-related PAS and eventually new versions of the LSB. Ongoing
liaison activities between SC 22 and the FSG, plus activities related
to the ultimate disposition of POSIX-Linux convergence, and the
potential for new initiatives within SC 22, suggest that there will be
some degree of ongoing Linux-related activity within JTC 1 for the
forseeable future although it is not possible to predict the amount or
the nature of it at
this time. Although there is no planned SC 22 parallel to the
INCITS SGL, the SGL has successfully worked directly with the FSG to
ensure that U.S. concerns are adequately handled and this model could
be preserved to deal with future Linux issues in the absence of a
formal international committee for which a U.S. Technical Committee
should be formed
Respectfully Submitted,
Dave Thewlis
Convenor, INCITS Study Group on Linux
26 June 2006