V2/01-0034, Final Minutes for plenary meeting #5 of V2, 7/30-31/2001

National Committee for Information Technology Standards
NCITS Secretariat, Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)
1250 Eye St. NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20005
Telephone 202-737-8888; Fax 202-638-4922;
Email: mailto:ncits@itic.org

DOC: V2/01-0020
Date: August 12, 2001

Project: N/A
Ref. Doc: V2/00-003
Reply to: Bill LaPlant, V2 convener
mailto:Bill.LaPlant@census.gov; blaplant@mindspring.com
MINUTES NCITS V2 PLENARY MEETING #5

Meeting Location:
Trace Center (University of Wisconsin)
5901 Research Park Blvd
Madison, Wisconsin 53711

Meeting Dates:
Monday, July 30, 2001 - 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM (CT) (Multipurpose Room at Trace Center)
Tuesday, July 31, 2001 - 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM (CT) (Multipurpose Room at Trace Center)

1. Call to Order - Meeting called to order at 9:30 AM by Bill LaPlant, Chair.

2. Introduction of Members and guests
Note, (P)=Principal, (A)=Alternate, (L)=Liaison, (G)=Guest, (X)=Ex Officio; numbers in brackets [] denote day of attendance.

2.1 Members attending )Ref: V2/SD01 "V2 Member Organizations and Contact Information")

Mike Burks (P) AT&T (by phone) [1]
Bill LaPlant (A) Dept. of Commerce (by phone) [1,2]
Shari Trewin (P) IBM (by phone) [1]
Nasser Ghazi (P) Microsoft [1,2]
Joe Roeder (P) NIB [1,2]
Mark Urban (P) PSINet [1,2]
John Chapman (P) Share [1,2]
Gregg Vanderheiden (P) Trace [1,2]
Gottfried Zimmerman (A) Trace [1,2]
Arnold Winkler (A) Unisys (by phone) [2]

2.2 Other Attendees

Janina Sajka (G) AFB [1,2]
Charles Sheppard (G) Dept. of Commerce [1,2]
Vicki Hampton (G) IBM (by phone) [2]
Mike Friedman (G) Microsoft [1,2]
Peter Korn (G) Sun Micro Systems (by phone) [1,2]
Al Gilman (G) Trace [1,2]

3. Approval of the Agenda (Ref: V2/01-0016 "

Draft Agenda for meeting #5 of V2, 7/30-31/2001")

Urban proposed a revised draft agenda containing the following changes:

- add items "8.1.3 Remote Console Devices (Zimmerman)" and "8.1.4 Document Collaboration Tool";

replace items 8.2.1 through 8.2.3 with "8.2.1 Management (Urban)";

- add items "9.1.2 Review of working document for AIAP" and "9.1.3 Priorities and Timelines";

- add items "10.2 Usage of AIAP (licensing, components)" and "10.3 Metadata (Urban)";

- replace the Monday schedule with "AM - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7" and "PM - 8 ".

A motion to approve the agenda was made by Chapman and seconded by Vanderheiden. The modified agenda was approved without objection. (See the attachment at the end of these minutes)

4. Approval of the Minutes for meeting #4 (ref: V2/01-0015 "Draft Minutes for plenary meeting #4 of V2, 5/7-8&11/2001")

Chapman moved to approve the draft minutes. Vanderheiden seconded the
motion and the minutes were approved without objection. (See V2/01-0019 "Final Minutes for plenary meeting #4 of V2, 5/7-8&11/2001")

5. Review of action items Ref: V2/01-SD-03 V2 ACTION ITEMS:

ACTION ITEM#3: Gilman will draft and post to work-def reflector a memo for w3 liaison letter saying what is overlap and type of expertise needed; coordinate with Urban. [p2/5.4] LaPlant to furnish comments. [P3/5.3]

OBE

Gilman will function as an unofficial intermediary and keep V2 informed of relevant WAI activities. [P5/5.3]

ACTION ITEM#4: Roeder and Vanderheiden will organize FAQ and V2 website to make V2 effort more understandable. [p1/10.1] [P3/5.4]

ONGOING.

Roeder said INFO-V2@NIST.GOV was set up to forward inquiries to all managers, but no questions yet received and no FAQ started yet. The V2 description adopted at the last plenary is posted and linked to the V2 Home and Working Web pages.

LaPlant said to put INFO-V2@NIST.GOV address on all literature on V2.

NEW ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ITEM: Roeder will put INFO-V2@NIST.GOV address on all literature on V2. [P5/5.4]

Gilman said we should increase V2 public visibility with all deliberate speed. He suggested adding links for background information materials to V2 website.

NEW ACTION ITEM: Gilman will get relevant links for background information to be put on V2 web site, will post list of links to work-def reflector; Urban will follow up with Gilman. [P5/5.4]

LaPlant reminded everyone that the managers were given authority to act on behalf of plenary for posting public documents between plenary meetings.

ACTION ITEM#6: LaPlant to keep V2 informed on section508 developments. [p1/13.8]

ONGOING

Members are aware of the recent events. Roeder asked if this should be changed to a standing item to keep a 508 update on the agenda.

Urban suggested assigning responsibility to LaPlant and membership.

Ghazi asked if this means that all are expected to contribute.

LaPlant said someone needs to take lead and filter news of 508 developments to the work-def reflector.

Urban agreed to take on this lead.

MODIFICATION TO ACTION ITEM 6: assign to All/Urban and restate as "post relevant section508 developments to V2 public reflector (ncits-v2@nist.gov) [P5/5.11]"

ACTION ITEM#11: LaPlant will draft 2 letters to NCITS about copyright issues re EDAPTA and Stanford. [P2/6]

OBE
The NCITS recommended call for patents will be published to V2 public reflector near the time of each plenary session. This will be added to the ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ITEMS list as a standing item.

NEW ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ITEM (standing): LaPlant/Roeder will post NCITS call for patents document to the V2 public reflector near the time of each plenary. [P5/5.11]

ACTION ITEM #16: All: Word-smith the purpose and scope on the TWiki site. [P2/9.0]

OBE

ACTION ITEM #17: Urban will be editor for the final wording of purpose and scope. [P2/9.0]

NOT DONE

To be combined with item 16.
post plenary note from Roeder: Combining this with item 16 will make this item void with OBE status.

ACTION ITEM #18: Burks will provide more information about AT&T WorldNet access devices. [P2/9.0]

Burks said he has a lot of stuff on hold. This item will be modified to say Burks will do presentation at next plenary on alternate access devices

LaPlant noted the committee can handle proprietary information with closed sessions, etc., if necessary.

ACTION ITEM #22: Laskowski and Sheppard will review draft ANSI ISO/IEC handbook 71. [P3/5.22] Gilman will remove untaxonomy parts of documentation. [P4/5.22]

NOT DONE

The previous modification to this item is not correct and it will be revised to read Laskowski and Sheppard will review UN draft ISO handbook 71 on taxonomy

ACTION ITEM #26: LaPlant will draft a policy for participation by telecommunications for consideration by NCITS/V2. [P2/5.11] LaPlant Will specify procedures for electronic participation to ensure attendance takes place. [P3/5.26] [P4/5.26]

OBE

ACTION ITEM #27: LaPlant will find someone to do security privacy liaison for V2. [p1/10.1] [p3/5.5] Chapman will provide a framing statement on what we need re security and sent to work- def reflector;

Urban will check with NCITS to find what resources are available on security issues;

Laskowski will find out what resources on security issues are available at NIST;

ALL will look for someone who can help with security issues and put out word that V2 needs input. [P4/5.27]

ONGOING

parts by Chapman, urban and Laskowski are done; last part is ongoing.

LaPlant will check with Laskowski on progress.

ACTION ITEM #40: Zimmermann will Talk to Ghazi about net meeting prior to next ad hoc V2A conference call.[P3/11.]

OBE

ACTION ITEM #46: Vanderheiden will Provide more explanation [detail?] for protocol requirement for human comprehensible text/characters; Vanderheiden's comment in requirements
document may need to be broken up into 2 parts. [P3/9.2]

DONE

ACTION ITEM #49: Management AD HOC will Decide if comments on collaboration documents should contain suggested text change and rationale, not just state concerns. [P3/9.2] Kindrick will put together a proposal for procedure on how rationale of changes on documents will be captured. [P4/5.49]

DONE
Post plenary note by Roeder: Kindrick's part is still ongoing; this item will be modified to say "Put together a proposal for procedure on how rationale of changes on documents will be captured. [P4/5.49]" and assigned to Kindrick.

ACTION ITEM #51: Sajka will give presentation on E books at next plenary. [P4/7.4]

DONE

Delivered during afternoon session.

ACTION ITEM #52: Sheppard will make sure public reflector errors are not V2 members; All V2 members will check that E-mail address is current. [P4/8.1.2]

DONE

Also, moved to ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ITEMS list as a standing item. [P5/5.52]

ACTION ITEM #53: Roeder will post 'call for patents' document to public reflector. [p4/8.35]

DONE
will be moved to administrative action items list.

ACTION ITEM #54: Gilman will provide summary of the discussion he led on X-Forms, etc. pP4/8.2[

ONGOING

ACTION ITEM #55: Ghazi/Kaneko will move all UPNP specific items into a reference document for UPNP and ask Peter Korn to create an equivalent doc for JINI. [P4/8.3]

OBE

Zimmermann is editor for the draft RC standard based on Microsoft proposal; standard is being made generic with reference to UPNP and JINI examples.

ACTION ITEM #56: Kaneko will send power point slides from presentation on Microsoft proposal for draft standard to Roeder to register as a reference document. [p4/8.3]

DONE

ACTION ITEM #57: LaPlant/Urban/Kindrick will work on glossary, acronyms and abbreviations.

ONGOING

ACTION ITEM #58: Roeder will add question of ecmascript to issues list. [P4/]

DONE

6. administrative items

Urban expressed thanks to Trace, NIST and Unisys for providing phone bridges for teleconference attendees.

Urban reminded members to make sure their e-mail addresses listed with V2 are correct. Burks said the
AT&T alternates are not getting work-def postings. Urban asked Roeder
to add this to the ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ITEMS list for the next manager conference call.

NEW ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ITEM: Sheppard will check that AT&T alternates are on the reflectors. [P5/6]

Urban asked members to submit plenary registration and teleconferencing requests in a timely fashion. Vanderheiden suggested the announcement of plenary meetings have a deadline for registration and teleconference requests.

NEW ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ITEM: LaPlant/Roeder/Sheppard will indicate on all V2 announcements a time to respond for teleconference requests and registration so that adequate preparations can be made. [P5/6]

Trewin noted the V2 website says to contact LaPlant for teleconference requests.

NEW ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ITEM: Roeder will change text of V2 web site contact links from just LaPlant to INFO-V2@NIST.GOV address which goes to all V2 officers. [P5/6]

Burks said he will look into the possibility of AT&T sponsoring some of the teleconferences.

NEW ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ITEM (standing): LaPlant/Roeder will ensure plenary announcements contain a reminder to members to check open issues list and provide comments. [P5/6]

LaPlant said he need to prepare an annual report for the last NCITS meeting in 2001, which will probably be in November. He will prepare a draft annual report to present at the next plenary. If the draft is not ready, the management group will finish it.

NEW ACTION ITEM: LaPlant will draft V2 annual report to NCITS for next plenary; this will be added under agenda item 6.1 for the next plenary. [P5/6]

7. Review of Related Activities

7.1 Access Board Proposed Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards ref: Federal Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards [http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/508standards.htm#PART 1194]

LaPlant reported on the 'popularity contest' run by the Accessibility Forum. The 2 top projects were for development of an access technology API and for development of accessibility metrics.

NEW ACTION ITEM: Roeder will put section 508 reflector sign up info in the minutes and on the V2 web site. [P5/7.1]

To sign up for the discussion list of section 508 issues, send an email to listproc@trace.wisc.edu. Leave the subject line blank and put "SUBSCRIBE section508 <your name>" in the body of the message with your own name in place of '<your name>'.

7.2 Web Accessibility Initiative ref:http://www.w3.org/WAI/ Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Home Page

Gilman said W3C is working on requirements for device independent presentation but his sense is that V2 will be ahead of that group. WAI may be a subset of device independent protocols.

Urban asked Gilman to keep cross checking so WAI and V2 do not go in divergent directions.

7.3 IEEE P2001 Web Engineering Best Practices Guidelines ref: http://computer.org/standards/Internet/index.htm
Internet Practices Standards Working Group

LaPlant reported he thought there was a formation of a balloting group. He noted that in May or June, he or Meiers forwarded the appropriate invitation.

7.4 Accessibility Forum ref: http://accessibilityforum.org/

LaPlant said pre registration for the next Accessibility Forum on September 19-21 (Wednesday-Friday) is now going on. (See http://www.accessibilityforum.org/meetings/Sept19-21/registration.html) All V2 principle and alternates are urged to register for the Accessibility Forum.

7.4 Other

No other related activities reports were offered.

8. Presentations

8.1 Technical Presentations

8.1.1 E-books

Sajka described the library materials for the blind and the evolution of technologies from braille, to recorded audio on long playing records, to cassettes, to digital talking books. There are currently 2 digital book standards; one is the Daisy consortium protocol and the other is the international NISO standard. Both groups are working together. NISO version 3.0 may be finalized by August and will be in alignment with Daisy 3.0. One goal is to have more meaningful navigation and another goal is to have synchronized multi media based on SMIL.

Vanderheiden noted that E-Books are important not only for blindness, but also for dyslexia and physical handicap. He said V2 should think about bringing the Daisy work forward into AIAP. We are dealing with the human computer interface and talking books is a simplified case

Vanderheiden noted that copyrights for viewing and for audio are separate. This might not be a problem because NLS (the national Library Service) has copyright exemptions or might claim fair use of digital format.

Gilman said we need to visit this a couple of times to determine what is overlapping or different, and what are the problems with digital rights management and the intellectual property rights of content.

8.1.2 X-Forms

Gilman reviewed what was discussed last time on this topic. He talked about dividing the alternate interface RC scenario into 3 domains:

- the target service,
- the customer premises equipment (the user RC), and
- the network system segment to assist the first 2.

The target device in the UPNP context includes hardware and software. In the RC scenario, the RC could be a user device with built in access technology. The slippery place is the network segment. The

requirement calls for more than a data network. It includes discovery service which is a community service to help the target and RC devices hook up. The network segment includes data, discovery, and third party services. A related view is where the requirements and preferences are coming from.

Gilman suggested an hour glass metaphor: lots of services, lots of users, connected through a narrow neck. We want to grow the variety of cases and normalize them.

LaPlant said there is a recent Scientific American article on this material.

Gilman said scalability issues overlap with accessibility issues. On the high end, we may gain as researchers learn to understand meta computing with grid architecture. On the low end, we have the device independent activity of the W3C. Another W3C activity to watch is internet community services.

urban asked if web services is a formal W3C group. Gilman said not yet, but it is going to happen.

Another group is IMS (Instruction Management System) Meta-Data project)

8.1.3 Remote Console Devices

Vanderheiden and Zimmermann gave a progress report on the Trace RC test platforms. Trace has grad students helping with the project.

Vanderheiden said they are going to test 3 prototypes:
- type 1 will be a desktop to target device,
- type 2 will be a standard handheld to target device (wireless approach)
- type 3 will be a legacy access technology product connected to an adapter (device to gateway to target).

Zimmermann said some of the main dimensions include:
- wireless (802.11 and bluetooth)
- networking (UPNP and JINI)
He said some elements of structure may be broken out, yet may be necessary; e.g., binding may be needed, but not specified.

Vanderheiden said a goal is for designs that need as little effort on the part of access technology vendors and on the part of target vendors. Gilman noted that people have already bought into the use of UPNP or JINI for ancillary devices.

8.1.4 Document Collaboration Tool

Nothing noted on this topic.

8.2 ad hoc Group Reports

8.2.1 Management

Nothing noted on this topic.

9. Discussion of tasks and priorities

Vanderheiden said editors should maintain an issues list from questions raised in the plenary and on the reflector. He also said we should have scheduled teleconferences open to all to hash out items and present solutions that can be agreed upon or rejected.

After some discussion, LaPlant said the ad hoc chairs will coordinate the schedule, then send a request for teleconference to Sheppard who will set up the phone bridge. Use the work-def reflector to announce the teleconference calls. Sheppard will be the contact for all teleconference requests, and will make sure there is no overlap of ad hocs conference calls.

The editors are accumulating explanation notes in separate document. We still need a mechanism of packing up an entire document.

There are some other issues, such as the question of languages (looking ahead for international standard).

LaPlant said we may need to separate those issues and take them to an ANSI committee on
those issue, e.g., languages.

9.1 Working Sessions

9.1.2 Review of working document for AIAP

There was a lengthy work session on the draft Remote Console Specification of the Alternative Interface Access Protocol (AIAP-RC) document. The editors captured the comments and issues. Only action items and some highlights are noted here.

Ghazi said the Microsoft team have prepared version 2 of their original proposal. In lieu of beginning a new V2 remote console specification, he submitted comments on version 1.2 of the V2 draft specification to the reflector.

In response to questions about formatting, LaPlant said we should use the ANSI file guide or the ISO style guide. Since ANSI accepts the ISO/IEC format for American National Standards, he recommended we use the ISO guide. (Ref: V2/01-0018 "ISO/IEC Rules for the structure and drafting of International Standards")

Later LaPlant made a motion that we follow the ISO style guide. Vanderheiden seconded the motion. Ghazi objected that there was not enough time to consider the issue and made a motion to table it. LaPlant offered an amendment that it be tabled until the next plenary. The motion to table LaPlant's motion (on following the ISO style guide) until the next plenary was seconded and passed by unanimous consent.

Zimmermann will pull out the open issues and maintain an issues list. Member organizations or delegates can associate their name with any issue.

Vanderheiden suggested using AAIML for Abstract Alternate Interface Markup Language. After some discussion there was no consensus but AAIML will be used in the interim as a place holder.

Korn noted the specification is missing the security layer. He said there are 2 aspects of security: 1 concerns the content of the conversation, and 2 concerns discovery and look up.

Vanderheiden suggested a third is physical security or control of the user's own products.

Chapman suggested a fourth is privacy control.

Korn added a fifth would be authentication.

Vanderheiden proposed we nominate a security committee, which should include Korn and Chapman.

MODIFICATION TO ACTION ITEM #27: Chapman and Korn will work on security issue; Chapman will schedule and Sheppard will set up a teleconference. [P5/9.1.2]

9.1.3 Priorities and Timelines

Trace will post the marked up document to the reflector, then post a cleaned up version later.

10. New Items.

10.1 Liaison strategy re: IEEE P2001, Accessibility Forum, and W3C

Nothing was noted on this topic.

10.2 Usage of AIAP (licensing, components)

Nothing was noted on this topic.

10.3 Metadata

This topic was tabled.

11. Future Meetings

The next V2plenary, chosen to be during the same week as the Accessibility Forum, will be on September 17-18, 2001, from 9 AM to 5 PM (ET), in Washington, DC. AFB offered to host the meeting and the venue will be confirmed when the meeting announcement is posted.

The next managers conference call is scheduled for Wednesday, August 8, 2001, at 2 PM (ET). LaPlant will set up the call and post the notice to the work-def reflector.

Zimmermann will lead a document review conference call on Friday, August 10, 2001, from 4 PM to 7 PM (ET). This is an ad hoc of the whole for the RC specification.

12. Summary of Action Items.

Roeder will post the active action items to the work-def reflector.

ITEM
RESPONSIBILITY
STATUS
DESCRIPTION
NOTES

#006
All/Urban
standing
post relevant section508 developments to V2 public reflector (ncits-v2@nist.gov) [P5/5.11]
** NOTES: Originally 'Rideout/McCoy/Roeder will organize FAQ and V2 website to make V2 effort more understandable' [p1/10.1]; moved to #004 and replaced
by #008. 'LaPlant will keep V2 informed on section508 developments.' [p2/13.8]; reassign to All/Urban and restate as "post relevant section508 developments
to V2 public reflector (ncits-v2@nist.gov) [P5/5.11]"

#004
Roeder/Vanderheiden
ongoing
organize FAQ and V2 website to make V2 effort more understandable. [p1/10.1] Gilman will get relevant links for background information to be put on V2 web
site, will post list of links to work-def reflector; Urban will follow up with Gilman. [P5/5.4]
** NOTES: originally 'LaPlant will contact Judy Brewer about w3c/wai liaison.' [P1/9.1]; renumbered to #003 and replaced by former #006 'Rideout/McCoy/Roeder
will organize FAQ and V2 website to make V2 effort more understandable.' [P2/12.3]; reassigned to Roeder/Vanderheiden [P3/5.4]; info-v2@nist.gov open to
all senders but distributed to LaPlant, urban and Roeder; queries to be answered and collected for FAQ. Roeder will create a primer FAQ; LaPlant will seek
graphics support for V2 brochure based on Vanderheiden presentation. [MCC-6/8/2001]; Gilman will get relevant links for background information to be put
on V2 web site, will post list of links to work-def reflector; Urban will follow up with Gilman. [P5/5.4]

#018
Burks
ongoing
provide more information about AT&T WorldNet access devices. [P2/9.0]; Burks will do presentation at next plenary on alternate access devices [P5.5.18]
** NOTES: added "Burks will do presentation at next plenary on alternate access devices [P5/5.18]

#022
Laskowski/Sheppard
ongoing
review UN draft ISO handbook 71 on taxonomy [P5/5.22]]
** NOTES: originally 'Sheppard and Laskowski will look further to determine if UN taxonomy model is appropriate for V2 [P2/9.2] and will look at draft
ANSI ISO/IEC handbook 71. [P3/5.22]' [P3/12.22]]; Gilman will remove untaxonomy parts of documentation. [P4/5.22]; Vanderheiden expressed problem with
groups of categories not consistent with accessibilities and allergies ( e.g., of not being related to smell etc.). no differentiation between those critical
to access and those which make more convenient. concern that both process and voting isn't good since committee basically went off and reworked. LaPlant
will contact iso delegation about Vanderheiden's concerns.
Zimmermann will coordinate and edit comments.
LaPlant will forward comments on behalf of V2 to virtual tag. [MCC-6/8/2001]; revised to "Laskowski and Sheppard will review UN draft ISO handbook 71 on taxonomy" [P5/5.22]

#027
LaPlant
ongoing
ALL will look for someone who can help with security/privacy issues and put out word that V2 needs input. [P4/5.27]; Chapman and Korn will work on security
issue; Chapman will schedule and Sheppard will set up a teleconference. [P5/9.1.2]
** NOTES: originally 'Rideout will do security privacy liaison for V2. [P1/10.1]' [P2/12.5]; revised to 'LaPlant will find someone to do security privacy
liaison for V2' [P3/5.5]; Laskowski will find out what resources on security issues are available at NIST; ALL will look for someone who can help with
security issues and put out word that V2 needs input. [P4/5.27]; LaPlant will send out call for security volunteers (see V2/01-0012) on public reflector.
[MCC-6/8/2001]; all done except "ALL will look for someone who can help with security/privacy issues and put out word that V2 needs input. [P4/5.27]", LaPlant
to check with Laskowski on progress. [P5/5.27]; Chapman and Korn will work on security issue; Chapman will schedule and Sheppard will set up a teleconference.
[P5/9.1.2]

#049
Kindrick
ongoing
Put together a proposal for procedure on how rationale of changes on documents will be captured. [P4/5.49]
** NOTES: Originally "Decide if comments on collaboration documents should contain suggested text change and rationale, not just state concerns. [P3/9.2]";
Kindrick will put together a proposal for procedure on how rationale of changes on documents will be captured. [P4/5.49]; done except Kindrick's part ongoing.
[P5/5.49]

#054
Gilman
ongoing
provide summary of the discussion Gilman led on X-Forms, etc. [P4/8.2]
** NOTES: Gilman will make a TWiki document. [MCC-6/8/2001]

#057
LaPlant/Urban/Kindrick
ongoing
work on glossary, acronyms and abbreviations. [P4/8.3] start a glossary based on terms in the requirements document. [P4/9.1]
** NOTES: Sheppard has set up V2G. Kindrick will add Trewin's definition on target service and will look at V2 scope document for terms that need
to be defined. [MCC-5/25/2001]

#059
LaPlant/Laskowski
ongoing
formalize a request from V2 to be put on the canvassing list. [P4/7.3]
** NOTES:

#060
Gilman
ongoing
get relevant links for background information to be put on V2 web site; post list of links to work-def reflector; Urban will follow up with Gilman. [P5/5.4]
** NOTES:

#061
LaPlant
ongoing
draft V2 annual report to NCITS for next plenary; this will be added under agenda item 6.1 for the next plenary. [P5/6]
** NOTES:

#062
Roeder
ongoing
put section 508 reflector sign up info in the minutes and on the V2 web site. [P5/7.1]
** NOTES:

13. Adjournment

Chapman moved to adjourn. Roeder seconded the motion and the fifth plenary of V2 ended at 4:30 PM (CT).

ATTACHMENT- FINAL AGENDA FOR V2 PLENARY MEETING #5

Doc: V2/01-0017
Date: July 27, 2001
Subject: Draft Agenda, NCITS/V2, Plenary Meeting 5
Project: Administrative
Ref. Doc:
Reply to: Bill LaPlant
Phone: 301-457-4887; 703-360-9184
email: bill.laplant@census.gov, blaplant@mindspring.com

DRAFT AGENDA
NCITS V2 IT Access Interfaces Technical Committee
Plenary Meeting Number 5

Location:
Multipurpose Room at
Trace Center (University of Wisconsin)
5901 Research Park Blvd
Madison, Wisconsin 53711
(301) 457-4887 (Bill LaPlant) or
(608) 265-4621 (Kate Vanderheiden)

Meeting Dates:
Monday, July 30, 2001 - 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM (CT) (Meeting Room )
Tuesday, July 31, 2001 - 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM (CT) (Meeting Room )
Meeting Registration: http://www.nist.gov/ncits

1. Call to Order (Mr. Mark Urban - Vice-Chairman)

2. Introduction of attendees.
Ref: V2/01-SD-01 List of Members and Contact Information

3. Approval of the Agenda.
Ref: V2/01-0017 (this document)

4. Approval of the Minutes for plenary meeting #4 ref: V2/01-0015 "Draft Minutes for plenary meeting #3 of V2, 2/7-8/2001)"

5. Review of action items Ref: V2/01-SD-03 V2 ACTION ITEMS:

ACTION ITEM#3: Gilman will draft and post to work-def reflector a memo for w3
liaison letter saying what is overlap and type of expertise needed; coordinate with Urban. [p2/5.4] LaPlant to furnish comments. [P3/5.3]

ACTION ITEM#4: Roeder and Vanderheiden will organize FAQ and V2 website to make V2 effort more understandable. [p1/10.1] [P3/5.4]

ACTION ITEM#6: LaPlant to keep V2 informed on section508 developments. [p1/13.8]

ACTION ITEM#11: LaPlant will draft 2 letters to NCITS about copyright issues re EDAPTA and Stanford. [P2/6]

ACTION ITEM #16: All: Word-smith the purpose and scope on the TWiki site. [P2/9.0]

ACTION ITEM #17: Urban will be editor for the final wording of purpose and scope. [P2/9.0]

ACTION ITEM #18: Burks will provide more information about AT&T WorldNet access devices. [P2/9.0]

ACTION ITEM #22: Laskowski and Sheppard will review draft ANSI ISO/IEC handbook 71. [P3/5.22] Gilman will remove untaxonomy parts of documentation. [P4/5.22]

ACTION ITEM #27: LaPlant will Find someone to do security privacy liaison for V2. [p1/10.1] [p3/5.5] Chapman will provide a framing statement on what we need re security and sent to work- def reflector;
Urban will check with NCITS to find what resources are available on security issues; Laskowski will find out what resources on security issues are available at NIST; ALL will look for someone who can help with security issues and put out word that V2 needs input. [P4/5.27]

ACTION ITEM #40: Zimmermann will Talk to Ghazi about net meeting prior to next ad hoc V2A conference call.